By Margo Kirchner Comments by Justice Rebecca Grassl Bradley made in the spin following the candidate debate between Judges Susan Crawford and Brad Schimel make one wonder about civility at the Wisconsin Supreme Court. Flanked at a podium by former Lieutenant Governor Rebecca Kleefisch, Grassl Bradley referred to four of her fellow justices as “colleagues,” but her remarks were not collegial. Grassl Bradley called the actions of the four more liberal justices, who now frequently form the majority in decisions, “tyranny.” She claimed that the four are acting politically to deprive the people of their rights and legislative representation. Not once has the new majority ruled against the Democratic governor or attorney general, Grassl Bradley said. She claimed that the conservative majority, to the contrary, did not act politically when they held the power. Grassl Bradley’s fellow justices were in the crowd as she criticized them.
Various rules of judicial conduct and attorney ethics touch on civility and respect for judges:
Regardless of whether Grassl Bradley’s comments crossed any line or rule, such public criticism of fellow justices outside of the context of written decisions was remarkable.
0 Comments
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
Donate
Help WJI advocate for justice in Wisconsin
|