By Gretchen Schuldt

​District Attorney John Chisholm said this week that he favors marijuana legalization if there are adequate implementation and regulatory structures in place.

"Let's come up with the best legal framework for allowing people to possess marijuana much as they do alcohol and tobacco," he said during an interview. 

If he can find the funding, Chisholm said, he would like to hold a one-day symposium in Milwaukee to explore how other states handled legalization implementation, the challenges they faced, and what they learned from their experiences.

Thirty-three states and the District of Columbia have legalized cannabis to some extent. 

Wisconsin still is a full prohibition state. Second offense possession of marijuana of any amount still is a felony in the state.

Voters in 18 November referendums around the state indicated they favor cannabis legalization. Milwaukee County voters in every municipality favored legalization of recreational marijuana for adults. 

Chisholm says he favors full legalization over an incremental approach. The state should ensure, before legalization takes effect, that the infrastructure is in place to ensure successful implementation and that cannabis tax revenue is distributed as intended. 

Downsides to legalization, he said, could include impaired driving, and negative impacts on school performance and health, he said.

"We just have to be cognizant of that," he said.

In the meantime, he said, his office will continue to use alternatives to prosecution, including diversion efforts and defaulting to municipal tickets instead of criminal prosecutions, to reduce the number of marijuana cases flowing through the court system.

He said he would prosecute some cases, though, "until the law is changed." 

As a prosecutor, he said, he has significant discretion, but "it's got to be based on a rational basis." 

He can't decide simply to not enforce the law, he said.

"I'm not a super legislator," he said.

By Gretchen Schuldt

​​The question on the Nov. 6 Milwaukee County election ballot was this: "Do you favor allowing adults 21 years of age and older to engage in the personal use of marijuana, while also regulating commercial marijuana-related activities, and imposing a tax on the sale of marijuana?"

The results:

By Gretchen Schuldt

Whoops! Updated Nov. 7 to correct Milwaukee County referendum language.

Voters supported marijuana legalization in all 18 referendums held around the state Tuesday, sending a strong message to police, prosecutors and policy makers that Wisconsin residents want to see change in cannabis laws.

Even in the City of Waukesha, where Republican Gov. Scott Walker grabbed 58 percent of the vote in his unsuccessful re-election bid, 77 percent of voters approved a medical marijuana referendum.

And in Eau Claire County, just 15 percent of voters said the existing criminal statutes should stay on the books, while 54 percent supported legalizing recreational use for adults.

The referendums are not binding. The Wisconsin Justice Initiative worked with partners around the state to have the measures placed on the ballot.

Other results from around the state, as reported by county websites, are below. Referendum wording is via Marijuana Moment.

Brown County: Should cannabis be legalized in Wisconsin for medicinal purposes, and regulated in the same manner as other prescription drugs?
Yes: 76 percent
No: 24 percent

Clark County: Should the State of Wisconsin legalize the use of marijuana for medical purposes and regulate its use in the same manner as other prescription drugs?
Yes: 67 percent 
No: 33 percent

Dane County: Should marijuana be legalized, taxed and regulated in the same manner as alcohol for adults 21 years of age or older?
Yes: 76 percent
No: 24 percent

Eau Claire County: Should cannabis (choose one):
(a) Be legal for adult, 21 years of age and older, recreational or medical use, taxed and regulated like alcohol, with the proceeds from the taxes used for education, healthcare, and infrastructure in Wisconsin?
Yes: 54 percent

(b) Be legal for medical purposes only and available only by prescription through a medical dispensary?
Yes: 31 percent

(c) Remain a criminally illegal drug as provided under current law?
Yes: 15 percent

Forest County: Should the State of Wisconsin allow individuals with debilitating medical conditions to use and safely access marijuana for medical purposes, if those individuals have a written recommendation from a licensed Wisconsin physician?
Yes: 79 percent
No: 21 percent

Kenosha County: Should the State of Wisconsin allow individuals with debilitating medical conditions to use and safely access marijuana for medical purposes, if those individuals have a written recommendation from a licensed Wisconsin physician?
Yes: 88 percent
No: 12 percent

La Crosse County: Should the State of Wisconsin legalize the use of marijuana by adults 21 years or older, to be taxed and regulated in the same manner that alcohol is regulated in the State of Wisconsin, with proceeds from taxes used for education, healthcare, and infrastructure?
Yes: 63 percent
No: 37 percent

Langlade County: Should the State of Wisconsin allow individuals with debilitating medical conditions to use and safely access marijuana for medical purposes, if those individuals have a written recommendation from a licensed Wisconsin physician?
Yes: 77 percent
No: 23 percent

Lincoln County: Should the State of Wisconsin allow individuals with debilitating medical conditions to use and safely access marijuana for medical purposes, if those individuals have a written recommendation from a licensed Wisconsin physician?
Yes: 81 percent
No:  19 percent

By Gretchen Schuldt

Representatives from the Wisconsin Justice Initiative and other organizations urged Milwaukee County voters Thursday to vote "yes" on the Nov. 6 referendum question asking whether recreational marijuana should be legalized and taxed.

"We're urging a 'yes' vote because it's time for Wisconsin to join the ever-growing list of states that have recognized that marijuana prohibition is an outdated and regressive policy, WJI President Craig Johnson said at a press conference. "We're urging a 'yes' vote because it's wrong to create criminals out of people using cannabis for pain relief or to help with other medical symptoms."

Marissa Ocampo, youth organizer for the ACLU of Wisconsin, said imposing hard punishments through the criminal justice system on marijuana users hasn't reduced usage. 

"Giving someone a criminal record for simple possession creates a lifetime of collateral damage," she said. "The punishment should fit the crime, and public opinion increasingly favors more sensible drug policy and a new approach to marijuana."

In 2013, she said, the ACLU released a report that showed that statewide, African-Americans were more than six times more likely than whites to be arrested for marijuana possession, while studies show that African-Americans and white use marijuana at the same rate.

The referendum question will ask, "Do you favor allowing adults 21 years of age and older to engage in the personal use of marijuana, while also regulating commercial marijuana-related activities, and imposing a tax on the sale of marijuana?"

County Supervisor John Weishan, who introduced the legislation authorizing the referendum, said arresting, prosecuting and incarcerating marijuana offenders was costly to taxpayers and the community.

"We should say, 'You know what?'" he said. "'It's time to end the prohibition on cannabis in the state of Wisconsin.'" 

State Rep. David Bowen (D-Milwaukee) said the referendum can spark a new discussion about marijuana legalization in the State Legislature. 

"It's been too taboo for too long," he said. 

Restoring Our Communities - Wisconsin, a task force of Milwaukee Inner-city Congregations Allied for Hope, also participated in the event. 

"Black people are more likely to be locked up" for cannabis offenses, ROC member Barbara Robinson said. Reforming the marijuana laws means "we can bring our prison rate down."

​WJI research shows that the vast majority of felony possession of marijuana second offense or greater cases are brought against African-American men arrested in the city of Milwaukee north of I-94.

"People used to describe marijuana as a gateway drug," WJI's Johnson said. "And unfortunately it is – because of the unequal way in which marijuana laws are enforced, for black and brown people it's a gateway into the criminal justice system, it's a gateway to jail, and it's a gateway to prison – and that's wrong."

He concluded: "We are asking the people of Milwaukee to speak up in strong voice and tell the legislators in Madison that it's time for Wisconsin to join the 21st century and end marijuana prohibition laws."

By Gretchen Schuldt

​WJI just charted its 100th Milwaukee County case of felony second offense possession of marijuana.

And yes, the defendant in the 100th case was African-American. Not much of a surprise there, since 87 percent of the defendants in these cases were African-American.

Another non-surprise: the defendant in the 100th case was arrested in the City of Milwaukee, north of I-94, where 80 of the arrests occurred. (We've found  just eight cases so far stemming from Milwaukee arrests south of I-94 and a total of 11 originating with arrests in the suburbs. One arrest took place on I-94.)

And, finally, yes, as in many, many other cases, the 100th arrest started as a traffic stop, this time for excessively tinted windows. Police said they smelled marijuana, and the rest is history recorded in court documents.

So is the racial / geographic concentration just a coincidence?

Absolutely not, judging from data dug up by the ACLU during litigation over the city's stop-and-frisk policy. The city and civil rights organization settled the federal class action lawsuit last month.

The ACLU found that between 2010 and 2017, Milwaukee police conducted more than 350,000 pedestrian and traffic stops for which they have no record of reasonable suspicion of criminal activity or a traffic or vehicle equipment violation, as required by the U.S. Constitution.


Former Police Chief Edward Flynn contributed to that number through his policy of encouraging traffic stops in certain neighborhoods as a crime-fighting measure. 

The city has agreed to rescind the policy.

Flynn said in a 2009 memo said that "the intelligent, assertive use of police authority to stop people and vehicles can be an invaluable tool that reduces crime and enhances safety in these same neighborhoods. ..."

"Traffic enforcement will continue to be a key part of our policing strategy going forward," he said. 
​
"It must be recognized that many of the people we stop will be released without further action. In this context, how our authority is employed is as important as a results of its use," he said.

By Gretchen Schuldt

The Dane County Board will consider whether to hold a Nov. 6 advisory referendum on legalizing marijuana.

The resolution already has support from a majority of the County Board. Twenty of the county's 37 supervisors are sponsors. 

The resolution that would authorize the referendum is very similar to the one approved by the Milwaukee County Board last month.

By Gretchen Schuldt

Seventy percent of the possession of marijuana cases filed in Milwaukee Municipal Court last year were against African Americans, records show.

Blacks account for just 40% of the city's population, but were defendants in 601 of the 860 marijuana possession cases.

In addition, 139 cases were filed against Hispanics, 30 more than the 109 cases filed against whites, according to Municipal Court statistics. Hispanics account for just 17 percent of the city's population; whites make up 45% of the city's residents. 

The Municipal Court caseload reflect activities of the Police Department. 

The Wisconsin Justice Initiative previously reported that African-Americans in Milwaukee County were far more likely to be charged with felony second offense possession of marijuana cases than are other races.

Simple possession of less than 25 grams of marijuana in the city can usually be charged as a municipal offense rather than as a state misdemeanor or felony. The municipal fine for possession is $50, though costs and fees will increase that to $124 for an adult and $94 for a juvenile. (Smoking marijuana in a public place is punishable by a fine of up to $250 plus fees and costs.)

Below is a map showing the Milwaukee or mostly Milwaukee zip codes where Municipal Court defendants charged with possession of marijuana resided and the number cases brought against those defendants.

Not all Municipal Court defendants live in Milwaukee and so not all cases are shown. 

By Gretchen Schuldt

Legalizing marijuana could bring the state an additional $138 million per year in tax revenue beginning in 2021, according to the State Department of Revenue.

That may be low, though -- the department estimates that Wisconsinites would buy just 55% of the volume purchased in Colorado.

​The department estimated the impact of legalizing marijuana as proposed in a bill introduced by State Rep Melissa Sargent (D-Madison) and State Sen. LaTonya Johnson (D-Milwaukee). The bill would legalize the sale and use of pot for recreational and medical purposes.

“Even by conservative estimates, my bill to legalize marijuana will be an economic boon for Wisconsin," Sargent said Tuesday. "It's not just about legalizing marijuana; it’s about legalizing opportunity. This bill will create new jobs, support local economies, and present a return on investment per dollar that’s unparalleled in other industries. The numbers support legalization and given the budget crisis we’re facing, it’s time for us to give legalizing marijuana serious consideration.”

Somewhat less money would be generated in the bill's first years, according to the fiscal estimate. "Sales of marijuana would increase state excise and sales tax and fee revenues by $60.5 million in FY19, $109.5 million in FY20, and $138 million in FY21," the department reported.

The department assumed that Wisconsin marijuana consumption patterns would be similar to those in Colorado, where excise tax collections rose from $41.7 million in 2014 to $89 million in 2015, and $143.2 million in 2016.

Overall, though, Wisconsin pot users would buy just 55% of the amount of marijuana sold in Colorado, the department said. DOR didn't explain its reasoning, saying only that the estimate is "based on information from the U.S. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration and the U.S. Census Bureau regarding marijuana usage rates and population differences." 

​Wisconsin's estimated population is actually a tad larger than Colorado's - 5.8 million here compared to 5.5 million in Colorado, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.

New legalization costs in Wisconsin would be fairly minimal in comparison to revenue, according to the estimate - a one-time expenditure of $345,980 for setting up processes and systems for the new tax, another $156,360 annually in related administrative costs, and $1.2 million for 10 new excise tax agents, a supervisor and one criminal investigator.

Yup, still ugly. 

The demographics sure say something about police practices. 85% of cases originated in the City of Milwaukee and 75% were made in Milwaukee in the area north of I-94.

Hmm.  

Move along, people. Nothing to see here. Don't look any closer.

You can read more about each of these 40 cases - all of them filed in 2016 - on The Pot Page.