By Gretchen Schuldt

​African Americans were defendants in more than three-fourths of the marijuana possession cases opened in Municipal Court last year, despite accounting for just 39% of the city's population.

Blacks were defendants in 462, or 77% of the 603 cases filed. Whites were defendants in 63 cases, or 10% of cases filed; Hispanics were defendants in 62 cases, also 10%; and Asians in 11 cases (2%), according to court statistics. Just one Native American was a defendant, and four defendants were of unknown races.

​"Frankly, these numbers are outrageous," WJI President Craig Johnson said. WJI actively advocates for cannabis legalization.

The figures "illustrate once again the disparate impact of cannabis prohibition laws on communities of color," he said. "Just as is the case with state criminal prosecutions, the numbers regarding Milwaukee Municipal Court citations show that African Americans are cited far more often than whites - and studies have consistently shown that both groups use marijuana at the same rates." 

​More defendants had home addresses in the predominantly African American zip codes of 53206 and 53209 – 65 and 64, respectively – than in any other Milwaukee zip code. (See map) ​

The city is 45% white, 39% African American, 19% Hispanic, 4% Asian, and 1 percent American Indian / Alaska Native, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.

Tickets for marijuana possession "shouldn't be dismissed as insignificant," Johnson said. "They can lead to warrants if unpaid, and can have a heavy financial burden on those who receive them, especially young people. They can also have an adverse impact on employment, rental applications and other areas of life. Wisconsin must join other Midwestern states in legalizing marijuana so that this source of disparity in our justice system can be eradicated."

Milwaukee home zip codes of defendants in 2019 Municipal Court possession of marijuana cases.

By Gretchen Schuldt

​African Americans were defendants in 21% of criminal marijuana cases filed in Wisconsin circuit courts last year while accounting for just 7% of the state's population, a Wisconsin Justice Initiative / American Constitution Society analysis shows.

The analysis included cannabis cases filed in each of the state's 72 counties.

The figures demonstrate "that marijuana prosecutions impact more heavily on the African American population," even though African Americans and Whites use marijuana at about the same rates, WJI President Craig Johnson said. 

The disparity "clearly points to another reason for legalizing it," he said.

There were 8,697 Circuit Court cases that included misdemeanor or felony cannabis charges, the analysis shows, and African Americans were defendants in 1,846 of those cases.

Whites, who account for 87% of the state's population, made up just 66% of defendants in marijuana cases, figures show. Whites were defendants in 5,776 cases.

American Indians / Alaska Natives also were over-represented among those facing cannabis charges. Members of that ethnic group account for about 1% of the state's population, but 5% of cannabis defendants. 

Hispanics and Asians were under-represented in marijuana cases. Hispanics make up 7 percent of the state's population and were defendants in 3% of cannabis cases, and Asians accounted for 3% of the population and 1% of cannabis defendants.

The analysis also shows that the filing rate of criminal cases varies widely across the state. In Waushara County, for example, one cannabis case was filed for every 120 county residents, the highest rate in the state; in Dane County, one case was filed for every 4,339 residents, the lowest filing rate statewide. It was followed by Milwaukee County, where one cannabis case was filed for every 3,292 residents.

The Black/White racial disparities in those latter two counties, however, were bigger than in any of the other 70 counties in the state. 

More information available on our 2019 Pot Page.

In Dane County, African Americans account for just 5% of the population but were 68% (85 of 125) of cannabis defendants, for a disparity of 63 percentage points, the largest in the state.

In Milwaukee County, 27% of residents are African-American, but Blacks accounted for 85% – (244 out of 288) – of cannabis case defendants, a gap of 58 percentage points, the state's second highest.

Those figures, Johnson said, shows that cannabis "is kind of the drug of the privileged."

There are some areas, he said, "where marijuana has sort of de facto legalization." Those areas are generally whiter, wealthier and more liberal, he said.

"My gut feeling is your over-policed communities end up with more charges," he said. "So we have unequal protection under the law."

The analysis also showed that 75% of the defendants in cannabis cases statewide were men. Milwaukee had the largest share of male defendants at 95%, followed by Dane and Jefferson counties. Some 90% of cannabis defendants in each of those counties were men.

By Gretchen Schuldt

​The results of 55 of 72 (76%) of Wisconsin counties' 2018 marijuana cases are in!

Some results of the analysis thus far:

• More men than women faced cannabis charges in every county reviewed thus far except Forest County, where the male-to-female ratio is uncertain because of the large number of defendants of unknown genders. The average percentage of female defendants in all counties reviewed was 25%, with the largest share in Forest County (47%) and the lowest in Milwaukee County (5%).
• Brown, Racine, Marathon, Eau Claire, and Columbia counties all issued more criminal cannabis cases  than did Milwaukee County, by far the largest county in the state.
• The 11 counties least likely to issue criminal marijuana charges were Dane, Milwaukee, Lafayette, Green, Kewaunee, Grant, Rock, Pierce, Marinette, Jefferson, Outagamie, and Bayfield. Each of those counties issued fewer than one marijuana case for every 1,000 residents.
• The seven counties most likely to issue cannabis charges are Florence, Burnett, Forest, Monroe, Langlade, Columbia, and Green Lake. Each of those counties issued more than one case for every 200 residents.
  
  

See more by checking out our 2019 Pot Page. 

And see earlier posts here and here.

The Wisconsin Justice Initiative and the American Constitution Society Milwaukee Lawyer Chapter launched this project to examine 2018 criminal cannabis cases filed in all 72 Wisconsin counties in an effort to better understand where, how, and against whom cannabis crimes are prosecuted.

By Gretchen Schuldt

We're halfway through our examination of cannabis cases filed in circuit courts last year, and thus far it looks like law enforcement in the northeastern part of the state is more aggressive in pursuing criminal marijuana charges than is law enforcement in southern Wisconsin.

The map and chart below show one measure of prosecutorial interest in pursuing cannabis charges – the number of county residents per criminal case that includes one or more marijuana charge. It's not a perfect measure, but it does paint a general picture of where folks are more likely to face criminal prosecution for pot. 

The numbers are good evidence that cannabis laws are not consistently applied across the state. Some municipalities, such as Milwaukee, pursue most simple possession cases in municipal courts and not in state circuit courts. Other places just don't take cannabis enforcement as seriously as others do. 

Still, it seems problematic that people in Florence County, where there are just 139 residents for every cannabis case filed, are statistically so much more likely to face criminal charges than someone in Dane County, where there are 4,339 people for every cannabis case.

​The idea that everyone is equal before the law apparently does not apply across county lines.

There is more information and detail about what's going on in the 36 counties examined thus far on our 2019 Pot Page. We continue to add to it.

This project is a partnership between the Wisconsin Justice Initiative and the American Constitution Society Milwaukee Lawyer Chapter. 

By Gretchen Schuldt

​People in Dane and Milwaukee counties were far less likely to be charged with marijuana crimes last year than were people in other counties in the state, but those charged in those two places were more likely to be African-American and male than in other counties, according to a review of 2018 cannabis cases in Wisconsin.

The review, a joint effort of the Wisconsin Justice Initiative and the American Constitution Society Milwaukee Lawyer Chapter, thus far has covered 24 counties, or one-third of the 72 counties in the state. 

Some findings:

Milwaukee County had the largest gender gap among cannabis case defendants. A whopping 95% of the 288 people charged with marijuana crimes or misdemeanors were men, far more than in most counties reviewed thus far. Dane County, where 90% of 125 defendants were male, had the second-highest share of male defendants.

Green County, with just 27 criminal cannabis cases last year, came in third. Twenty-four of the defendants, or 89%, were men.

Milwaukee County was number one when it comes to the share of cannabis defendants charged who were African American – 85%. Dane County was second, with 68% Black defendants.

Dane County's defendants were more disproportionately African-American than were Milwaukee County's because Dane County's 5% Black population share is so much smaller than Milwaukee County's 27%.

​The share of cannabis defendants charged in Dane County who were Black was 63 percentage points higher than the Black share of the county population; in Milwaukee County, the difference was 58 percentage points. The third place finisher was Fond du Lac County, where the difference was 31 percentage points.

As these charts illustrate, there is not much that is consistent in cannabis enforcement in Wisconsin. Two people engaged in similar conduct in different counties may well be treated very differently by the criminal justice system.

Follow along as we document the wildly erratic enforcement of cannabis laws in Wisconsin.
Additional data for each county is posted on The 2019 Pot Page and we'll be updating and expanding our charts on this blog.​

By Gretchen Schuldt

​The Wisconsin Justice Initiative and the American Constitution Society Milwaukee Lawyer Chapter are teaming up to refresh WJI's Pot Page with court data from across the state.

WJI, in a previous version of the page, examined felony marijuana cases – possession of marijuana, second offense or greater – in Milwaukee County. That project pretty clearly illustrated that African-American men on the North Side of Milwaukee are disproportionately charged with that crime.

The new page already is uncovering some interesting information. In Milwaukee County, for example, there was one marijuana case filed last year for every 3,292 residents; in the much smaller Ashland County, at the top of the state, there was one marijuana case filed for every 371 residents. In other words, Ashland County law enforcement is much more aggressive in prosecuting marijuana crimes when population is factored in.

Surprisingly, there were just as many women charged – 15 – in Ashland County as there were in Milwaukee County. Those women accounted for 36 percent of the 42 Ashland County cases, but just five percent of the 288 Milwaukee County cases. 
​
Follow along as we look at data from all 72 counties.

​By Gretchen Schuldt

​The number of possession of marijuana cases filed in Milwaukee Municipal Court fell 17 percent from 2017 to 2018, court records show.

There were a total of 994 adult and juvenile possession of marijuana charges opened in 2017 and 824 in 2018, according to the figures. That is a year-to-year decline of 170 cases.

The caseload reflects police activity, but is not a total count of arrests, as some cases may get dismissed before they get to court. 

In November, 75 percent of City of Milwaukee voters supported legalization of recreational marijuana. Some 52 cases were filed that month. In December, however, 134 cases were filed, the most since November, 2017.

By Gretchen Schuldt

​District Attorney John Chisholm said this week that he favors marijuana legalization if there are adequate implementation and regulatory structures in place.

"Let's come up with the best legal framework for allowing people to possess marijuana much as they do alcohol and tobacco," he said during an interview. 

If he can find the funding, Chisholm said, he would like to hold a one-day symposium in Milwaukee to explore how other states handled legalization implementation, the challenges they faced, and what they learned from their experiences.

Thirty-three states and the District of Columbia have legalized cannabis to some extent. 

Wisconsin still is a full prohibition state. Second offense possession of marijuana of any amount still is a felony in the state.

Voters in 18 November referendums around the state indicated they favor cannabis legalization. Milwaukee County voters in every municipality favored legalization of recreational marijuana for adults. 

Chisholm says he favors full legalization over an incremental approach. The state should ensure, before legalization takes effect, that the infrastructure is in place to ensure successful implementation and that cannabis tax revenue is distributed as intended. 

Downsides to legalization, he said, could include impaired driving, and negative impacts on school performance and health, he said.

"We just have to be cognizant of that," he said.

In the meantime, he said, his office will continue to use alternatives to prosecution, including diversion efforts and defaulting to municipal tickets instead of criminal prosecutions, to reduce the number of marijuana cases flowing through the court system.

He said he would prosecute some cases, though, "until the law is changed." 

As a prosecutor, he said, he has significant discretion, but "it's got to be based on a rational basis." 

He can't decide simply to not enforce the law, he said.

"I'm not a super legislator," he said.

By Gretchen Schuldt

​​The question on the Nov. 6 Milwaukee County election ballot was this: "Do you favor allowing adults 21 years of age and older to engage in the personal use of marijuana, while also regulating commercial marijuana-related activities, and imposing a tax on the sale of marijuana?"

The results: