Wisconsin Justice Initiative Inc.
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Pressroom
  • The Pot Pages 2015
  • 2016

Juror, totally clueless, was not confused: Appeals Court

4/25/2016

0 Comments

 
The first-degree sexual assault of a child trial was nearing its end. Jurors had been questioned and selected. All four witnesses -- three for the prosecution and defendant Keith Beauchamp -- had testified, according to court records. 

And then Juror 508 said she had just a few questions.

She wrote them down and handed them to the bailiff. They were these: 

“Why are we having this trial?"

"Who is charging?"

"Is someone suing for money?” 

The case wrapped up and the jury, including Juror 508, found Beauchamp guilty. Eau Claire County Circuit Judge Lisa Stark -- now a District 3 Appeals Court judge -- sentenced him to life in prison without the possibility of parole.

Years later, in a postconviction motion, Beauchamp argued that Juror 508's questions showed her "inability to hear, inattentiveness, confusion, or lack of comprehension" was so significant that a mistrial was warranted. His lawyer was ineffective because he did not seek one, Beauchamp said.

Circuit Judge Kristina M. Bourget, who handled the issue, dismissed the motion without a hearing. No mistrial was warranted, Bourget said, because the contention that Juror 508 did not understand the case was "speculation" and there was insufficient evidence the juror was inattentive or did not hear what was going on.

Picture
Beauchamp appealed, but a panel for District 3 of the Court of Appeals -- where Starks is deputy chief judge -- agreed with Bourget.

There was evidence of confusion about the "nature of the proceedings and the procedural status of the case" but the questions posed by Juror 508 at the end of the trial -- including "“Why are we having this trial?" --  "do not suggest an inability to comprehend material testimony," the panel said in a ruling released earlier this month. The panel included Appeals Judges Mark A. Seidl, Thomas Hruz, and Patricia Curley, a District 1 Court of Appeals judge assigned to the case. 

(Bourget, a Scott Walker appointee in 2013, was elected to her seat in 2014 and unsuccessfully challenged Seidl for the Appeals Court seat last year.)


Besides, the panel said, the judge gave jury instructions to clear up any questions. 
From left: Curley, Hruz, Seidl: Not knowing at the end of the trial why it was held or who was bringing charges did not show non-understanding of "material" testimony.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Gretchen Schuldt  is executive director of the Wisconsin Justice Initiative.

    ​Margo Kirchner is development director and general counsel of the Wisconsin Justice Initiative.

    Sign up for the free WJI newsletter. 
    Donate
    Help WJI advocate for justice in Wisconsin

    Archives

    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015

    RSS Feed

    Categories

    All
    501(c)3
    Brad Schimel
    By The Numbers
    Choosing Judges
    Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform
    Confronting Mass Incarceration
    Crime Of The Month
    Fix The Forty
    Gretchen Schuldt
    In The Courts
    Juvenile Justice
    Margo Kirchner
    Marijuana
    Miscellaneous
    Municipal Courts
    Press Releases
    Prisons
    The Illustrated Casebook
    The Law Of The Law
    Walker's Judges
    Wisconsin Court Of Appeals
    Wisconsin Department Of Justice
    Wisconsin Supreme Court

Copyright © 2017 Wisconsin Justice Initiative Inc.
​The Wisconsin Justice Initiative Inc. does not endorse candidates for political office. The Wisconsin Justice Initiative Inc. is a 501(c)3 organization.
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Pressroom
  • The Pot Pages 2015
  • 2016
✕